Directing Behavior through the Images and Materials of an Enamel Belt

By Annapoorna Holdmore

Belt for a Lady's Dress, c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

Belt for a Lady's Dress, c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

INTRODUCTION

In 1930 the Cleveland Museum of Art acquired a 14th century, Italian belt for a lady’s dress. Currently on display in the medieval galleries, the girdle is a little over 93 inches long and is constructed from plain white woven textile, probably linen, enveloped in a braided fabric made of silver wire. Riveted to the belt are ninety gold-gilt silver and basse-taille enamel plaques that rotate ninety degrees shortly after the line of holes ends. The subjects of most of the enamels can be divided into three main groups: plaques depicting men and women playing music or dancing, hybrid creatures, and images of courtly lords and ladies. The buckle features a woman playing a tambourine and is attached to enamel pieces featuring instrumentalists. The long end of the belt consists of three sequential enamel plaques showing a couple sitting apart, a woman crowning herself in a chaplet of leaves, an angel, then a couple embracing. On the reverse of these plaques are two engraved hybrid monsters. Far from simply being an ambiguous, decorative wardrobe accessory, this belt and other examples like it, were an elaborate, meaningful form of wearable artwork which reinforced pertinent cultural values to shape the behavior of the wearer. This particular girdle was most likely a marriage gift, which was intended to shape the behavior of the woman who wore it, encouraging her, through its sumptuous images, materials, physicality, and symbolic connotations, to have sexual relations with her husband, whilst warning her away from adultery. The Cleveland belt allows us to see how accessories could communicate ideas through imagery and materials, as well as through use  and wear in the Middle Ages. 

MEDIEVAL GIFTS

In the Middle Ages, gifts were typically meaningful and receivers were often expected to reciprocate in some way. Gift giving was common in many aspects of daily life particularly when making social, political, or economic alliances. Similar belts were a part of dowries such as that of Lena Sassetti’s in 1384. Giovanni Niccolini also describes giving three silver belts to his niece when he arranged her marriage in 1353. Other existing belts show similar imagery and  materials. One north Italian belt from the Metropolitan Museum shows a comparable combination of hybrid creatures, music making, and courtly lords and ladies and consists of a dyed textile base with engraved silver plaques.

 The images of music, dancing, and hybrid creatures found on the Cleveland belt are also commonly found on courtly romantic gifts. Lena Sassetti, mentioned earlier, additionally received a mirror, a comb, and a purse after her marriage. Items like these, as well as jewels and decorated boxes, were commonly given as romantic or marriage gifts. These gifts often featured sexually suggestive images that sometimes also warned of the dangers of sexuality and attempted to rein it in. Though women were often thought to be lascivious and enjoy or even physically require sex more than men, their desire needed to be provoked for the purpose of reproduction. Common themes on love gifts include courtly activities such as music, dancing, or couples interacting with a circlet, an allegory for sexual penetration. Many courtly activities were allegories for romance. Their materials could sometimes reinforce these themes. Ivory in particular was often used for romantic gifts and the material was seen as being similar to skin because of its color and the fact that it warms to the touch. Medieval husbands and families would have wanted to provoke desire in a bride whilst ensuring her faithfulness to make certain that any children she had were legitimate. The tension between a woman’s sexuality and the familial expectations to be virtuous and loyal meant that medieval society would have felt it was necessary to continually remind women of their duty. Therefore, the impulse behind the images on courtly marriage gifts was to concurrently inspire sexual desire whilst directing it towards the correct person.

 Like many of these objects, the Cleveland girdle contains images  of courtly activities such as music and dancing, yet also warns the viewer away from  inappropriate sexual activity with its depictions of hybrid creatures.  However the materials, physicality, and process of making the belt are often overlooked, and would have reinforced the message behind these images. 

 
Belt, c. 1330–1350, North Italian. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Belt, c. 1330–1350, North Italian. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art

A Lady Crowning Her Lover Mirror Case, c. 1300, Paris, France. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London

A Lady Crowning Her Lover Mirror Case, c. 1300, Paris, France. © Victoria and Albert Museum, London

MATERIALS

The behavior of the lady who wore the Cleveland belt may have been impacted by the significance of the material of the belt, as well as its weight and length. Belts from this period are often intricately woven with patterns in colored or gilt threads. In other examples of existing belts, such as Eric of Pomerania’s Belt, the Dune belt, and the two girdles Metropolitan Museum of Art, the metal or enamel pieces are attached directly to colorful textiles. Though not quite as explicit as other, more private items, when given as a gift, the girdle would make a meaningful vehicle for this iconography that was both enticing and warning. The braided silver fabric on the Cleveland belt would also have increased its value so that  it could have served two purposes as both a wardrobe accessory given on the occasion of a  marriage, and a romantic, beautifying object comparable to jewelry. This similarity to jewelry is  accentuated by the materials of the belt which would have been costly enough to help counter the  dowry as part of the bride’s new wardrobe. It seems likely that such an expensive item would have been given as a marriage gift as opposed to a romantic present. Silver was often used for  religious objects like reliquaries, and its whiteness was representative of purity and virginity. The material of the belt could have been indicative of what was expected from a new bride.  Furthermore, since both silver and gold were used for religious objects, the silver and gilt on the  girdle would have emphasized the religious reasoning behind the warnings given by the images,  the belt’s material implying that she needed to remain faithful to avoid sin. 

The textile which forms the inside of the belt is likely made of linen. Because the process of making linen was slow and involved, it was also a costly material. However, since the textile was originally entirely covered by silver mesh and can only be seen now as a result of damage, it is likely that the textile’s main purpose was to serve as a physical support for the silver mesh and enamels, and to help show off the brightness of the metal. Linen is naturally brown and must be bleached to make it white, so it seems likely that the color was intentionally chosen to enhance the silver mesh over top. White is also symbolic of virtue, which would have been expected of the lady. Yet the color is also often symbolic of skin as exemplified in many ivory objects. The white color of the textile could refer to the sensual skin of the woman who wore the belt as it was enveloped by pure and virtuous silver.

The colored glass of the enamels is also imbued with meaning even without their iconography. The plentiful, jewel-like array of plaques set in gold makes the belt appear extremely luxurious and the brightness of the colors draws the eye to the garment, showing off what would likely be one of the more expensive pieces of any ensemble the lady might wear. Enamel glass also evokes stained glass windows, reinforced by the quatrefoil shape of the small plaques. Gothic churches often use stained glass to emphasize the concept of “celestial light.” Similarly, light is reflected by the silver backing through the colored enamel to create the characteristic appearance of basse-taille enamel.

Belt for a Lady's Dress (detail), c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

Belt for a Lady's Dress (detail), c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

The reflection of light off of the silver would reinforce the concepts of purity and virginity conveyed by the silver material, stressing the religious reasoning of the belt’s iconography. The backgrounds of many of the larger enamels are blue, which could have likewise emphasized the garment’s warnings since blue was seen as a celestial color which symbolized heaven and the gospels. Especially when combined with metals the wearer would have seen on reliquaries, the belt seems to utilize the visual language of religion and perhaps the authority of God to accentuate its didactic warning to avoid adultery while also using sumptuous colors and metals to attract the viewer. In several ways, the process of creating the basse-taille enamels could have also reinforced both the virtues of purity and virginity expected of a new bride as well as the sexual implications found throughout the imagery. To make the basse-taille plaques, the silver metal must first be chased in low relief to make a design. If the silver material of the belt was representative of purity and virginity, then the engraving of that material with a stylus or tool to create the enamel images could have reinforced the concept of the loss of virginity that is found on the belt buckle. A similar concept can also be found in medieval ivory objects. As mentioned earlier, ivory was considered akin to skin and the gouging or carving of figures from this flesh like material could have been akin to sexual acts. The resulting impressions could then be seen as indirectly relating to sexual activity especially when combined with the suggestive imagery found on many courtly love gifts.

Belt for a Lady's Dress (detail), c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

Belt for a Lady's Dress (detail), c. 1375-1400, Italy. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

When the didactic, sexually charged images are engraved onto the “pure” silver material, they seem to imply a transition from virginal, to sexual. The washing  and subsequent manipulation and building of the ground glass to make the enamel could also have been symbolic of the purity expected of the lady before her marriage and the subsequent  guiding of her behavior afterward. Finally, rather than re-firing the enamel to smooth and level  the glass at the end of the process, most medieval enamelists would have ground the glass down  to the level of the metal and then polished it until it was transparent. This repetitive rubbing to  make the glass smooth may have added a layer of sexual meaning that was conveyed by the evenly smoothed enamel finish. 

The silver, gilt, white linen, and enamel glass of the belt can then be understood to echo the messages imparted by the images, as well as to underscore the virtuous qualities that the giver of the belt hopes to inspire in the woman whilst enticing her with its luxurious qualities. The emphasis on purity references the state in which the new bride would have been expected to come into the family and would have also referenced how the family expected her to behave, particularly in terms of her sexuality. Marital sex for the sole purpose of procreation retained some of the virtue ascribed to virginity.

USE AND WEAR

Such silver belts would have been heavy, though not entirely unmanageable to wear. The Cleveland girdle would not have been a convenient garment but could have been worn for an occasion like a wedding if the woman could hold the end in her hand or tuck the end into her belt. Holes in a portion of the quatrefoil plaques intended for the tongue of the buckle suggest that the belt was supposed to be functional as opposed to simply decorative and could have been adjusted if the woman gained or lost weight, or throughout pregnancies.

The fact that the images change direction where the  Cleveland belt would begin to hang down alongside the woman’s dress also lends support to the notion that it was used and that it was made to be examined. The silver belt in the Metropolitan Museum of Art also includes rotated enamels. The waistband of this style of belt would typically  be wrapped around the waist with the end hanging free to the floor similarly to a belt seen on a  statue of the Virgin Mary from the same period. The loops that appear near the larger enamels next to the buckle were common to medieval belts and could have held purses. If the girdle was intended to be merely decorative, it seems unlikely that useful features like loops would have been added or that holes would have been made for the fastening. If the belt was not meant to be worn, the quatrefoil enamels which contain the holes could have instead held images, and it is unlikely that the designer of the girdle would not have taken advantage of that space. The fact that much of the silver on the belt is a thin wire mesh may help reduce the weight of the garment. When historian Susan Mosher Stuard  mentions the belt, she postulates that the mesh would make the belt lighter than other examples  from the time and that its length would have been due in part to a desire to flaunt an especially  expensive item. This indicates that though the belt may not have been particularly convenient  due to its length, it was certainly wearable. In any case, the richer and stiffer fabrics such as  brocade that were available to wealthy ladies would have also helped support the mass of the girdle. A Cleveland Museum of Art conservation file written in 1994 also states that there are scratches on the buckle of the belt which the conservator, Rainer Richter, claims may indicate  use. Yet, the weight and impracticality of the girdle would have forced the wearer to consider her  actions each time she moved and would have also restricted any rigorous activity, therefore  reminding the wearer of the messages given by the images and reinforcing them through physical  means.

The dimensions of the belt would have also rendered it burdensome. Given the Cleveland  belt’s length of 93⅛ inches, it seems unlikely that the woman who wore this belt could have let it  hang to the ground since a significant portion of the end would drag on the floor in front of her  feet. Other belts of such extraordinary length, like the Erfurt girdle which measured at 157.48  inches, were wrapped multiple times around the waist with the end hanging down the front of the  lady’s skirt. However, the Cleveland girdle could not have been worn this way because of the  position of the holes, which only allow for the belt to be wrapped around the waist once. The  leftover portion would almost certainly drag on the ground in front of the lady’s feet. Instead, the  engravings of hybrids on the back of the largest and most ornate enamels which are found at the end of the belt hint to the end being held by the wearer. The lady could then contemplate the images, strengthening their message of warning. The three hinged sections, which could be made to wrap  over the waistband, suggest the ability to tuck the belt into itself. The end sections of the belt  would then be more visible along with the back of the belt. Examples show that this type of  hinge is not uncommon. The silver belt mentioned previously has a single hinge at the end of the  belt which could be for the same purpose, and other girdle fragments in the British Museum contain hinged joints also.

Another way the belt could be worn without the end reaching the ground was if the lady was heavily pregnant and the girdle was worn above the stomach with the end positioned to hang down in front. In this case, it seems likely that the heavy fabrics and folds of her dress would keep the length of the girdle in place and that the end would, at most, reach just to her feet. The fact that the belt is so long may also indicate that the bride’s family wanted her to be pregnant multiple times. A legitimate pregnancy would fulfill the hopes and expectations of faithful sexual behavior communicated by the girdle. The later months of pregnancy would be the only time during which the bride likely would not need to be careful of the end of the belt; a welcome relief for someone whose own body has become more cumbersome.

Representations of women wearing belts around the waist with the end hanging to the  hem of their dresses are numerous. However, if the woman was not pregnant, she would not have  been able to wear the belt this way due to its length. Slightly more recent representations may  show how the girdle could have been worn. Two tapestries from The Lady with the Unicorn depict a somewhat similar belt being tucked up into the waistband, along with the outer layer of  the woman’s dress. Though these tapestries are dated much later than the belt, a purse made in  Paris in 1340 depicts a lady having tucked the front of her garment up into the waistband of her  belt in a comparable way suggesting that ladies may have shown off their sumptuous garments this way. Displaying the silver on the back would emphasize the luxuriousness of the object, flaunting the lavish material that would normally be hidden against the body. Other belts such as the gilt girdle with half-length figures in the Metropolitan Museum of Art lack these hinged sections but are much shorter, allowing the end to hang free. The hinged sections are also smooth at the back, which would allow the wearer to avoid snagging her dress with the enamels. With the hinged end tucked into the waistband section of the belt, the length would still hang fairly low, allowing for the object to be thoroughly on display. 

 
Virgin and Child, c. 1315-1320, Lorraine, France. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

Virgin and Child, c. 1315-1320, Lorraine, France. © The Cleveland Museum of Art

CONCLUSION: COMMUNICATION THROUGH ICONOGRAPHY, MATERIALITY, AND USE

The fourteenth-century Italian belt for a lady’s dress in the Cleveland museum is a prime  example of a gift which, through its iconography and variable styles of wearing, allowed the gift  giver and the wearer to communicate multiple messages. The iconography of musicians, dancers, and hybrids and couples is didactic, teaching through contrasting examples of behavior. These  ideas are reinforced by the belt’s materials and process of construction. The images were  intended to be closely contemplated by the wearer, but she would also have some control over  how she used the accessory and what images she displayed to others, allowing her some agency  over how she presented herself. Other courtly gifts may have been used similarly to  communicate what acceptable conduct looked like, while still enticing the viewer in order to  encourage the receiver to behave in a certain way. The length of the belt, which allows for  multiple methods of use, is unique to surviving garments but could also indicate the giver’s  expectation of eventual pregnancy in addition to being a physical method to guide behavior. Yet  the flexibility also allows the wearer some agency to display the images in such a way that could  communicate information about herself. It is likely that the Cleveland belt was not unique in its  length, function, and iconography. It therefore opens up new avenues to consider how medieval  women’s clothing was worn and how these garments may have affected their movement and  behavior, thus impacting their identities.

 

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bowles, Edmund. “Haut and Bas: The Grouping of Musical Instruments in the Middle Ages.”  Musica Disciplina 8 (1954): 115–40. 

“Musical Instruments at the Medieval Banquet.” Revue Belge de Musicologie/Belgisch  Tijdschrift Voor Muziekwetenshap 12, no. 1/4 (1958): 41–51.  

“Musical Instruments In Civic Processions during the Middle Ages.” Acta Musicologica 33, no. 2/4 (1961): 147–61.

Camille, Michael. Gothic Art: Glorious Visions. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. Publishers,  1996.

The Medieval Art of Love: Objects and Subjects of Desire. London: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.  Publishers, 1998. 

Campbell, Jean. The Commonwealth of Nature: Art and Poetic Community in the Age of Dante.  University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008. 

Capellanus, Andreas. The Art of Courtly Love. Edited by John Jay Parry. New York: Columbia  University Press, 1990. 

Chabot, Isabelle. “Marriage, Dowry, and Remarriage in the Sassetti Household (1384–97).” In  Medieval Italy: Texts in Translation, edited by Kathrine L. Jansen, Joanna Drell, and  Frances Andrews, 446–50. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009. 

Gertsman, Elina. The Dance of Death in the Middle Ages. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols  Publishers, 2010. 

Karras, Ruth Mazo. Sexuality in Medieval Europe: Doing Unto Others. Routledge, 2017. Kessler, Herbert L. “The Eloquence of Silver: More on the Allegorization of Matter.” In  L’allégorie Dans l’art Du Moyen Age. Formes et Fonctions. Héritages, Créations,  Mutations, edited by Christian Heck, 49–65. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011. 

Oswald, Dana. “Monstrous Gender: Geographies of Ambiguity.” In The Ashgate Research  Companion to Monsters and the Monstrous, edited by Asa Simon Mittman and Peter J  Dendle, 343–63. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2012. 

Stuard, Susan Mosher. Gilding the Market: Luxury and Fashion in Fourteenth-Century Italy. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.

“Marriage Gifts and Fashion Mischief.” In The Medieval Marriage Scene: Prudence, Passion,  Policy, 169–87. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2005.

Wolfthal, Diane. “The Sexuality of the Medieval Comb.” In Thresholds of Medieval Visual Culture: Liminal Spaces, edited by Elina Gertsman and Jill Stevenson, 176–94. Rochester, NY: Boydell Press, 2012.

20201006_134043.jpg

Annapoorna explores the iconography of the belt more fully in her paper entitled "Attraction and Repulsion: Directing Behavior through the Images and Material Nature of a Belt." She would be thrilled to discuss any aspect of the object more fully to anyone who is interested.

You can get in touch with Annapoorna at annapoorna.moore@case.edu

Previous
Previous

CJ x BJC Residents Talk

Next
Next

Q&A with Sarah Murphy